[OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips load balancing performance test with SIPP

Sam Govind govoiper at gmail.com
Wed Sep 28 07:10:24 CEST 2011


I can't tell any significant difference for just asterisk load balancing.
Both will be performing at par. No difference at all except the
configuration code.

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Nick Khamis <symack at gmail.com> wrote:

> Shlonak Faisal,
>
> I saw that you worked on load balancing your * box. We are currently
> looking to do the same. Any reason you
> selected OpenSIP vs. Kamailio?
>
> Thanks in Advnace,
>
> Ninus.
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Faisal Rehman
> <faisal.rehman22 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> > I want to test the Performance of Load Balancing with the help of sipP in
> > which I have been un-successful yet. But I want to simply pass the calls
> > from OpenSIPS to the Free-Switch which are running on different ports.
> Let
> > say OpenSIPS is running on 5161 and FS on 3141 on the same server using
> the
> > below command:
> > ./sipp -sn uac 64.156.193.193:5161
> > & in result I am getting 404 Not Found every time. Is there any mistake
> in
> > the above command or I can't test both OpenSIPS & FS on the same server?
> >
> >
> > With Best Regards,
> >
> > Faisal Rehman
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at lists.opensips.org
> > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110928/cab735a7/attachment.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list