[OpenSIPS-Users] Prioritised Load Balancing in OpenSIPS

Faisal Rehman faisal.rehman22 at yahoo.com
Tue Oct 4 10:06:08 CEST 2011


Hi Sam,

What do you say this link will work for me to fulfill the desired requirement:

http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsTutConcurrentCalls

 

Best Regards,


Faisal Rehman


________________________________
From: Sam Govind <govoiper at gmail.com>
To: Faisal Rehman <faisal.rehman22 at yahoo.com>; OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2011 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Prioritised Load Balancing in OpenSIPS


Hey,
So, it comes to weighted Load balancing !! 
1- Intelligent use of resources column in DB can work for you. i.e define resources allocation per MediaServer specs.
2- Adding multiple same "dst_uri"s for hig-end servers i.e if you want 4:1 distribution then add 4 entries of same server and one of the second one.
Thats just my idea.

Regards,
-Sammy


On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Faisal Rehman <faisal.rehman22 at yahoo.com> wrote:

Hi Everyone,
>
>
>I have been working on the Load Balancing project of OpenSIPS & I have been successful yet in case of normal balancing, but now I want to move towards prioritised load balancing. Let me explain this for you, for example if I am having few Asterisk or Free-switch servers & the servers have different resource & memory specifications from highest (let's say 48G RAM) to lowest (let's say 4G RAM), so I want the most powerful servers to be used first & then the load is gradually distributed to the least & least & least server depending upon its resource & memory power.
>
>
>So is that something I can do & if it is possible then how can I achieve that?
>
>
> 
>Best Regards,
>
>Faisal Rehman
>_______________________________________________
>Users mailing list
>Users at lists.opensips.org
>http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20111004/ee662508/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list