[OpenSIPS-Users] Pacth rtpproxy

[Razvan Crainea]

Hello Denis,

In the official release of RTPProxy, the timeout parameter (-T) controls 
both session establishment and rtp timeout. This is a problem since we 
would like to have a long period for call establishment, but a fast 
media timeout detection.
In the patched version of RTPProxy, the -W parameter allows you to 
specify a longer period for call establishment. If not set, it has the 
default value of 60 seconds.
If you decide not to use patched version of RTPProxy, the timeout 
notification will work, but you will have the same timeout in both 
situations.

Regards,
Razvan


On 01/12/2011 07:38 AM, Denis Putyato wrote:
>
> Hello Razvan,
>
> “OpenSIPS shouldn't even try to terminate the call because it isn't 
> established yet”
>
> As I understand I just do not need to use –W key when starting 
> rtpproxy, it does not work at all?
>
> *From:*users-bounces at lists.opensips.org 
> [mailto:users-bounces at lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *Razvan Crainea
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 11, 2011 6:49 PM
> *To:* OpenSIPS users mailling list
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Pacth rtpproxy
>
> Hello Denis,
>
> You are right, OpenSIPS shouldn't even try to terminate the call 
> because it isn't established yet. I just added a small fix to solve 
> this problem. Please update your code from svn to use this fix.
> The RTPProxy patch was done against commit 
> "600c80493793bafd2d69427bc22fcb43faad98c5". You can either get the 
> RTPProxy from git, change it's branch and then apply the patch, or you 
> can download an already patched version from 
> http://opensips.org/pub/rtpproxy/.
>
> Regards,
> Razvan
>
> On 1/11/2011 2:19 PM, Denis Putyato wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I try patch rtpproxy gotten from git. And there is such error during 
> patching
>
> patch < rtpproxy_timeout_notification.patch
>
> patching file main.c
>
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 70 (offset 2 lines).
>
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 120.
>
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 132 with fuzz 1 (offset 4 lines).
>
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 211 with fuzz 2 (offset 4 lines).
>
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 276 (offset 4 lines).
>
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 742 with fuzz 2 (offset -26 lines).
>
> Hunk #7 succeeded at 758 with fuzz 2 (offset -26 lines).
>
> 1 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file main.c.rej
>
> patching file rtpp_command.c
>
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 795.
>
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 888.
>
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file rtpp_command.c.rej
>
> patching file rtpp_defines.h
>
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 95.
>
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file rtpp_defines.h.rej
>
> patching file rtpp_notify.c
>
> rtpproxy_timeout_notification.patch is a patch for timeout 
> notification which  divide rtp timeout and session initiation timeout 
> notification as said in
>
> http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/devel/nathelper.html#id249142
>
> This patch I got from SVN version of latest Opensips.
>
>   
>   
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org  <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 
Razvan Crainea
www.voice-system.ro

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110112/4c7d9b3b/attachment-0001.htm>