[OpenSIPS-Users] Q Value not acting right after Serialize_branches

[duane.larson at gmail.com]

Bogdan,

I applied the patch and now all three calls are being called at once in  
parrallel even though the Q-Values are the following

90127X2XX9 should get called first || Q-value is 90
90148X7XX9 should get called second || Q-value is 50
90133X9XX9 should get called last || Q-Value is 40


On Aug 9, 2011 11:43am, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org> wrote:














> Got your email - thank you.





> Please try the attached patch.





> Regards,


> Bogdan





> On 08/09/2011 07:14 PM, Duane Larson wrote:



> Bogdan,





> I am going to email you the debug directly since it is

> probably to big to post to pastebin. You should see the email

> in a minute or two.








> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:18 AM,

> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bogdan at opensips.org>

> wrote:




> Hi Duane,





> your logs do not cover the most important part - the first

> "next_branches"... Could you repost ?





> Regards,


> Bogdan









> On 07/15/2011 03:43 AM, Duane Larson wrote:











> I have a scenario where there are three numbers

> that need to be called





> 90127X2XX9 should get called first ||

> Q-value is 90


> 90148X7XX9 should get called second || Q-value

> is 50


> 90133X9XX9 should get called last ||

> Q-Value is 40








> The issue i am seeing is that the first and

> second number are getting called in parrallel and

> then the third number gets called last. I have

> debug the issue with level 6. I'm not able to paste

> the debug to pastebin because it is too big. So

> here is aa shortened version. Hopefully the

> relevant stuff


> http://pastebin.com/D8NK50X9




> Just for something to compare I have the second

> scenario where the Q Value works properly without

> issue





> 90127X2XX9 gets called first || Q-Value

> is 90


> 90133X9XX9 gets called second || Q-Value is 70


> 90148X7XX9 gets called last || Q-Value is

> 50





> With this each call is called serially in the

> order that they should.


> I also have a debug for this but I also can't

> paste this to pastebin.


> Here is the relevant stuff








> http://pastebin.com/vRiLiRw9









> _______________________________________________

> Users mailing list

> Users at lists.opensips.org

> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users












> --

> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

> OpenSIPS eBootcamp - 19th of September 2011

> OpenSIPS solutions and "know-how"







> _______________________________________________


> Users mailing list


> Users at lists.opensips.org


> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


















> --


> --


> *--*--*--*--*--*


> Duane


> *--*--*--*--*--*


> --






> _______________________________________________

> Users mailing list

> Users at lists.opensips.org

> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users











> --

> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

> OpenSIPS eBootcamp - 19th of September 2011

> OpenSIPS solutions and "know-how"







-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110809/fd8b06a1/attachment.htm>