[OpenSIPS-Users] uac_replace_from and two openSIPS 1.6.4

Anton Zagorskiy a.zagorskiy at oyster-telecom.ru
Tue Apr 5 12:24:14 CEST 2011


Hi Bogdan,

Thank you, its working.
What about my first question - mixing two openSIPS on a same DB where second
openSIPS is just for b2b top hiding?





WBR, Anton Zagorskiy
VoIP Developer, Oyster Telecom
Phone.: +7 812 601-0666
Fax: +7 812 601-0593
a.zagorskiy at oyster-telecom.ru
www.oyster-telecom.ru



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan at opensips.org]
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 7:49 PM
> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
> Cc: Anton Zagorskiy
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] uac_replace_from and two openSIPS 1.6.4
> 
> Hi Anton,
> 
> On 04/04/2011 01:28 PM, Anton Zagorskiy wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I have two questions:
> > 1. I have 2 openSIPS running on a one machine - first for routing,
> > second for b2b (it has just one line 'b2b_init_request("top hiding")',
in
> common).
> > Since b2b modules require a DB, can I use a same DB for both openSIPS ?
> if no table is used by both instances, you can share the same DB between
> 2 opensips.
> > 2. I'm using uac_replace_from and uac_replace_to and I'm getting a
> > strange behavior. I know that those functions shouldn't be called
> > twice in a one branch, but they aren't - a call flow is:
> > 1) REQUEST_ROUTE: route ->  route[invite] (uac_replace_from) ->
> > t_relay() with t_on_failure("1")
> > 2) FAILURE_ROUTE: failure_route[1] ->  route[failure] ->
> > route[invite]
> > (uac_replace_from) ->  route[to_b2b] (uac_replace_to) ->  t_relay with
> > t_on_failure("1")
> > And here I'm getting bad headers:
> > Record-Route has two 'vsf' tag and From is "num1" "num2"
> > <sip:num1 at domain1sip:num2domain2>
> >
> > Where is a problem?
> The problem is that whatever you do in the main request route does apply
to
> all the branches (existing or future) of that request.  So you
> uac_replace_from (from 1) does apply to all branches, including to the
> branch you create in failure route).
> 
> The correct approach will be to use a branch_route[] where to do the
> from/to replacements, instead of request route.
> 
> Regards,
> Bogdan
> 
> --
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS eBootcamp - 2nd of May 2011
> OpenSIPS solutions and "know-how"




More information about the Users mailing list