[OpenSIPS-Users] [RFC] What repo to use for 2.0 ?

[Brett Nemeroff]

I'm certainly open to trying new things. But without looking into the
complexities of the newer systems, I know that they can get very complicated
very quickly. I do like, however, integrated code hosting, like you
suggested. But I know similar options are available with SVN.

Personally, I don't care as long as it's easy to pull from a command line.
:) right?
-Brett


On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:19 PM, David J. <david at styleflare.com> wrote:

> Brett,
>
>  From a user perspective then its not so difficult to learn a few extra
> commands.
> Most users I would imagine want to download the code and compile.
>
> Although, I agree that SVN is by far more adopted.
>
> I think going forward, companies like GitHub and BitBucket offer great
> code hosting options for developers, which seems to be gaining lots of
> traction. Most projects I see are moving off google code which I believe
> is svn based.
>
> I personally have invested lots of time in SVN, but wouldn't think it
> would be a burden to try something new.
>
> Just an opinion.
>
>
>
>
> Brett Nemeroff wrote:
> > Bogdan,
> > I personally really like SVN. It's widely accepted and well
> > documented. I'm sure that some newer code repo systems offer some
> > really nice features, but I'm curious what percent of the community
> > has used newer repo types and would be comfortable using them to their
> > full potential (properly!).
> >
> > I'm speaking, of course, as a user and not a developer.
> >
> > Thanks for your consideration. :)
> >
> > -Brett
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> > <bogdan at voice-system.ro <mailto:bogdan at voice-system.ro>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi everyone,
> >
> >     As we are getting closed to first working code for OpenSIPS 2.0 (a
> >     proto
> >     core including config, transport, threading, reactor and
> >     dispatcher), we
> >     will upload the code the public SF repo.
> >
> >     I would like to get some feedback from you about what repo type to
> >     use -
> >     as we have the opportunity to start a fresh new piece of code, we
> have
> >     the option to use a different repo than SVN.
> >
> >     SF offers the following options
> >        - SVN
> >        - git
> >        - mercurial
> >        - bazaar
> >
> >     Should we keep SVN ? pros ? minuses ? something much better ?
> >
> >
> >     Regards,
> >     Bogdan
> >
> >     PS: should we create a poll on the project web site ?
> >
> >     --
> >     Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> >     www.voice-system.ro <http://www.voice-system.ro>
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Users mailing list
> >     Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
> >     http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at lists.opensips.org
> > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100302/be1a9ff0/attachment-0001.htm