[OpenSIPS-Users] opensips 1.6.1 crashes on NOTIFY?

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bogdan at voice-system.ro
Thu Feb 4 10:45:07 CET 2010


Hi Alex,

updating from 1.6 SVN branch, are these crashes still happening ?

Regards,
Bogdan

Alexander wrote:
> Any ideas? I'm afraid to touch something and make things worse :)
>
> 22 декабря 2009 г. 14:23 пользователь Alexander <goal81 at gmail.com 
> <mailto:goal81 at gmail.com>> написал:
>
>     What about this one:
>
>     Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
>     [New process 15892]
>     #0 0x00e1fddb in t_lookup_request (p_msg=0x81d2f20,
>     leave_new_locked=1) at ../../mem/../hash_func.h:65
>     65 for (p=s2->s; p<=(end-4); p+=4){
>     (gdb) bt
>     #0 0x00e1fddb in t_lookup_request (p_msg=0x81d2f20,
>     leave_new_locked=1) at ../../mem/../hash_func.h:65
>     #1 0x00e21859 in t_newtran (p_msg=0x81d2f20) at t_lookup.c:1051
>     #2 0x00e243a0 in w_t_newtran (p_msg=0x81d2f20, foo=0x0, bar=0x0)
>     at tm.c:1006
>     #3 0x080545dd in do_action (a=0x81cc30c, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:967
>     #4 0x08057308 in run_action_list (a=0x81cc30c, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:139
>     #5 0x080af2be in eval_expr (e=0x81cc378, msg=0x81d2f20, val=0x0)
>     at route.c:1240
>     #6 0x080aed39 in eval_expr (e=0x81cc3a4, msg=0x81d2f20, val=0x0)
>     at route.c:1553
>     #7 0x080aeccf in eval_expr (e=0x81cc3d0, msg=0x81d2f20, val=0x0)
>     at route.c:1558
>     #8 0x080533c2 in do_action (a=0x81cc770, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:689
>     #9 0x08057308 in run_action_list (a=0x81cc770, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:139
>     #10 0x080554a7 in do_action (a=0x81c85b4, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:119
>     #11 0x08057308 in run_action_list (a=0x81c85b4, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:139
>     #12 0x080554dd in do_action (a=0x81c868c, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:706
>     #13 0x08057308 in run_action_list (a=0x81c868c, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:139
>     #14 0x08056625 in do_action (a=0x81c86f8, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:712
>     #15 0x08057308 in run_action_list (a=0x81c86f8, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:139
>     #16 0x08056625 in do_action (a=0x81c8764, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:712
>     #17 0x08057308 in run_action_list (a=0x81c8764, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:139
>     #18 0x08056625 in do_action (a=0x81c87d0, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:712
>     #19 0x08057308 in run_action_list (a=0x81c87d0, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:139
>     #20 0x08056625 in do_action (a=0x81c883c, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:712
>     #21 0x08057308 in run_action_list (a=0x81c883c, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:139
>     #22 0x08056625 in do_action (a=0x81c88a8, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:712
>     #23 0x08057308 in run_action_list (a=0x81c88a8, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:139
>     #24 0x080554dd in do_action (a=0x81ca360, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:706
>     #25 0x08057308 in run_action_list (a=0x81bd578, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:139
>     #26 0x080576a3 in run_top_route (a=0x81bd578, msg=0x81d2f20) at
>     action.c:119
>     #27 0x0809ddf2 in receive_msg (
>     buf=0x8192380 "NOTIFY sip:62.117.120.98 SIP/2.0\r\nVia:
>     SIP/2.0/UDP 194.190.163.139:5061;branch=z9hG4bK-d5a4f117\r\nFrom:
>     206401 <sip:206401 at 62.117.120.98
>     <mailto:sip%3A206401 at 62.117.120.98>>;tag=d825811556491d55o0\r\nTo:
>     <sip:62.117.120.98>\r\nCall-ID: d42b6"..., len=347,
>     rcv_info=0xbfd71e84) at receive.c:162
>     #28 0x080e5056 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:492
>     #29 0x08070adf in main (argc=3, argv=0xbfd72094) at main.c:821
>
>     22 декабря 2009 г. 13:10 пользователь Anca Vamanu
>     <anca at opensips.org <mailto:anca at opensips.org>> написал:
>
>         Hi Alexander,
>
>         Unless you modified the sources, this is not the right
>         backtrace. The
>         line numbers do not correspond with the ones in the trace.
>
>         Regards,
>
>         --
>         Anca Vamanu
>         www.voice-system.ro <http://www.voice-system.ro>
>
>
>         Alexander wrote:
>         > Oh, found one. Seems to be right core file. GDB says:
>         >
>         > #0 0x080fbb52 in parse_params (_s=0xec, _c=695, _h=0x81d44bc,
>         > _p=0x1d4) at parser/../trim.h:61
>         > #1 0x080f135f in parse_msg (buf=0xb61eacc4 "э>\035\bп╛\036╤",
>         > len=135861088, msg=0x305) at parser/msg_parser.c:567
>         > #2 0x080ed9c7 in aaa_prot_bind (aaa_url=0xb61eacac,
>         prot=0x80) at
>         > aaa/aaa.c:85
>         > #3 0x003b9205 in ?? ()
>         > #4 0xb61eacac in ?? ()
>         > #5 0x00000080 in ?? ()
>         > #6 0x003e2df4 in ?? ()
>         > #7 0x371f3654 in ?? ()
>         > #8 0x00000007 in ?? ()
>         > #9 0x08180e85 in _tr_buffer ()
>         > #10 0x08180e81 in _tr_buffer ()
>         > #11 0x00000000 in ?? ()
>         >
>         > 2009/12/22 Alexander <goal81 at gmail.com
>         <mailto:goal81 at gmail.com> <mailto:goal81 at gmail.com
>         <mailto:goal81 at gmail.com>>>
>         >
>         > I have no core file for now:
>         >
>         >
>         > Dec 22 11:02:08 srv opensips[26182]: INFO:core:handle_sigs: core
>         > was not generated
>         >
>         > Strange - "ulimit -c unlimited" and calls to setrlimit() in
>         > OpenSIPS produce no core file.
>         >
>         > NOTIFY packets come from clients. Also, Opensips sometimes sends
>         > keepalive NOTIFY packets, but my route(5) is called inside
>         "uri ==
>         > myself" section.
>         >
>         > 2009/12/22 Anca Vamanu <anca at opensips.org
>         <mailto:anca at opensips.org> <mailto:anca at opensips.org
>         <mailto:anca at opensips.org>>>
>         >
>         > Hi Alexander,
>         >
>         > Can you please investigate the core with gdb and print here
>         > the output.
>         > It seems awkward to me that you expect to receive Notifies and
>         > reply to
>         > them. Wat kind of notifies are those? Sent by clients or the
>         > presence
>         > server?
>         >
>         > Regards,
>         > Anca
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Alexander wrote:
>         > > Hi all.
>         > >
>         > > I've tried to update to Opensips 1.6.1, but encountered the
>         > > following problem. Opensips starts successfully, but soon
>         > almost all
>         > > it's processes die one by one and only two processes remain.
>         > > For example, if right after start we have:
>         > >
>         > > # ps ax | grep opens
>         > > 26182 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26183 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26184 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26185 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26186 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26187 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26188 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26189 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26190 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26191 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26192 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26193 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26194 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26195 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26196 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26197 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26198 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26199 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26200 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26201 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26202 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26203 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26204 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26205 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26206 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26207 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26208 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > >
>         > > When processes die, we have only:
>         > >
>         > > #ps ax | grep opens
>         > > 26182 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > > 26184 ? S 0:00 ./opensips -k 0x11110204 -u opensips
>         > >
>         > > If I set debug=6, the following is written to
>         > /var/log/messages:
>         > >
>         > > Dec 22 11:02:03 srv rtpproxy[17011]: INFO:rxmit_packets:
>         > caller's
>         > > address filled in: 195.182.195.206:1024
>         <http://195.182.195.206:1024>
>         > <http://195.182.195.206:1024> <http://195.182.195.206:1024>
>         > > (RTP)
>         > > Dec 22 11:02:03 srv opensips[26184]: Route 5 - NOTIFY
>         > > Dec 22 11:02:05 srv opensips[26185]: Route 5 - PUBLISH
>         > > Dec 22 11:02:06 srv opensips[26183]: Route 5 - NOTIFY
>         > > Dec 22 11:02:06 srv opensips[26185]: Route 5 - NOTIFY
>         > > Dec 22 11:02:06 srv opensips[26185]: Route 5 - NOTIFY
>         > > Dec 22 11:02:06 srv opensips[26186]: Route 5 - NOTIFY
>         > > Dec 22 11:02:06 srv opensips[26186]: Route 5 - NOTIFY
>         > > Dec 22 11:02:08 srv rtpproxy[17011]: INFO:handle_command:
>         > lookup on
>         > > ports 36664/35096, session timer restarted
>         > > Dec 22 11:02:08 srv rtpproxy[17011]: INFO:handle_command:
>         > pre-filling
>         > > callee's address with 87.251.142.50:5006
>         <http://87.251.142.50:5006>
>         > <http://87.251.142.50:5006> <http://87.251.142.50:5006>
>         > > Dec 22 11:02:08 srv opensips[26208]:
>         > CRITICAL:core:receive_fd: EOF on 13
>         > > Dec 22 11:02:08 srv opensips[26182]: INFO:core:handle_sigs:
>         > child
>         > > process 26186 exited by a signal 11
>         > > Dec 22 11:02:08 srv opensips[26182]: INFO:core:handle_sigs:
>         > core was
>         > > not generated
>         > > Dec 22 11:02:08 srv opensips[26182]: INFO:core:handle_sigs:
>         > > terminating due to SIGCHLD
>         > >
>         > > As I see, the last message received by process with PID
>         > 26186 is
>         > > NOTIFY, and then it crashes.
>         > >
>         > > "Route 5 - NOTIFY" is in this block of configuration file:
>         > >
>         > > # SUBSCRIBE and PUBLISH Message Handling
>         > > # --------------------------------------
>         > > route[5]
>         > > {
>         > > if (!t_newtran())
>         > > {
>         > > xlog("L_INFO", "Failed to create transaction\n");
>         > > sl_reply_error();
>         > > exit;
>         > > }
>         > >
>         > > if (is_method("PUBLISH"))
>         > > {
>         > > xlog("L_INFO", "Route 5 - PUBLISH \n");
>         > > handle_publish();
>         > > }
>         > > else if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE"))
>         > > {
>         > > xlog("L_INFO", "Route 5 - SUBSCRIBE\n");
>         > > handle_subscribe();
>         > > }
>         > > else if (is_method("NOTIFY"))
>         > > {
>         > > xlog("L_INFO", "Route 5 - NOTIFY\n");
>         > > t_reply("200", "OK");
>         > > exit;
>         > > }
>         > >
>         > > exit;
>         > > }
>         > >
>         > > In main routing logic:
>         > >
>         > > if (method == "SUBSCRIBE" || method == "PUBLISH" || method
>         > == "NOTIFY")
>         > > {
>         > > route(4);
>         > > return(0);
>         > > }
>         > >
>         > > As I see, Opensips sets core dump limit, if it's turned
>         > off, but no
>         > > core is produced (OS is CentOS 5.3).
>         > >
>         > > What can be wrong? Version 1.6.0 did not crash like this.
>         > >
>         >
>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         > >
>         > > _______________________________________________
>         > > Users mailing list
>         > > Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>         <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org
>         <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>>
>         > > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>         > >
>         >
>         >
>         > --
>         > Anca Vamanu
>         > www.voice-system.ro <http://www.voice-system.ro>
>         <http://www.voice-system.ro>
>         >
>         >
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > Users mailing list
>         > Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>         <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org
>         <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>>
>         > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         >
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > Users mailing list
>         > Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>         > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>         >
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Users mailing list
>         Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>         http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>   


-- 
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
www.voice-system.ro




More information about the Users mailing list