[OpenSIPS-Users] [OpenSIPS-Devel] Planning next release - Roadmap

David Villasmil david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
Tue Aug 26 17:41:45 CEST 2008


I suppose I still don't get it right.

If you're using a db table as a backend, you can store as many
dialogs/branches as you want... each record would have its own CSeq... when
there's a PRACK from any of them you just update the CSeq for THAT branch...
I don't see the complication...

OR I simply don't GET IT!

jeje!

;)

d

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc at in.ilimit.es>wrote:

> El Tuesday 26 August 2008 17:29:09 David Villasmil escribió:
> > Isn't it a lot easier (for instance) using a new field the dialog table
> to
> > store the last CSeq and getting it from there before sending +1?
> > just a question
>
> No, read again my mail about the issues when forking and one of the
> branches
> requires PRACK. This would change the local CSeq for just *that*
> early-dialog
> in the UAC.
>
> So if the proxy wants to manage/change the CSeq it must be capable of
> handling
> each early-dialog independently, and OpenSIPS doesn't allow that since, as
> Ovidiu said, it associates a dialog to a client transaction in the proxy.
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> ibc at in.ilimit.es
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080826/cf39dd19/attachment.htm 


More information about the Users mailing list